Family disputes are not just legal cases. They are stories where emotions often outweigh logic, and legal positions intertwine with personal dramas. In my practice, I have seen how court processes only escalate conflicts, especially when it comes to children, property division, or communication after divorce. Instead of resolving the situation, there is delay, insults, and exhaustion for all parties involved.
In such cases, mediation is an effective alternative—more humane, flexible, and often more efficient. In this article, the author shares their insights: what mediation really is, when it works, when it doesn’t, and what legal consequences it entails.
What Mediation Is and How It Is Regulated
Since 2021, Ukraine has officially had the Law of Ukraine “On Mediation.” It establishes the basics: that mediation is a voluntary and confidential procedure in which an independent mediator helps the parties reach an agreement.
No one forces anyone; the decisions are made by the participants themselves.
In family disputes, mediation can be applied in almost all situations: divorce, resolving issues related to children, alimony, property.
The Law of Ukraine “On Mediation” provides this opportunity—the question remains whether people are willing to choose this path.
Court vs. Mediation: What Is the Fundamental Difference
Clients often ask: “Why opt for mediation when we can just go to court?” And that’s a valid question. But court doesn’t always solve the problem—it simply issues a decision. The crucial aspect is how viable that decision will be, how well both parties will adhere to it—that’s a different matter.
Mediation’s main advantage is flexibility. Here, you can consider things that won’t be recorded in a court protocol: a child’s emotional state, parents’ work specifics, schedule nuances, and more. And the agreement can be tailored to real life, not a “one-size-fits-all” lawsuit.
How It Works in Europe and in Ukraine
In EU countries like France or the Netherlands, you simply can’t file a family case in court without attempting mediation. In most cases—up to 70%—parties reach an agreement even before the hearing. This saves a lot of time, money, and nerves.
In Ukraine, we are still at the beginning. Over the past years, the success rate of mediation in family disputes has ranged from 12% to 25% depending on the region. But the trend is positive, giving hope.
Why Mediation Is Often Better Than Court
From a practical standpoint, the advantages are clear:
-
Maintains contact between parents after divorce, crucial for the child;
-
Resolves conflicts in weeks, not years;
-
The agreement can consider aspects a court decision simply can’t cover;
-
Ability to approach the matter considering psychological aspects.
In other words, mediation is not just a “life chat.” If parties agree, they can:
-
Implement the agreement independently;
-
Notarize it—the document will have executive force;
-
Submit it to court for approval as a conciliation agreement if the mediation agreement is concluded in court proceedings.
But it’s crucial to remember: the mediation agreement must be legally sound. If it contradicts the law or is flawed, it may be declared void in the future.
Barriers to Mediation Development in Ukraine
Here, everything is standard:
-
Most people are unaware of this possibility;
-
The state has yet to promote mediation effectively;
-
There is a shortage of qualified mediators, especially in regions.
Nevertheless, in my opinion, there is a perspective, and if we look ahead a bit:
-
Mediation could become part of the free legal aid system;
-
In certain cases, it could be made mandatory before court;
- There are pilot court projects with mediation implementation already being tested—and showing promising results.
Conclusion
Mediation is not just a new “trendy” option. It is a real, practical tool that helps people reach agreements like adults—without emotions, unnecessary pressure, and conflicts. As a lawyer, I can confidently say: when people want to reconcile, mediation works. The Law of Ukraine “On Mediation” already allows this; now the main thing is for people not to be afraid to try a different, more constructive path.