The reduction of the unserved part of the sentence does not apply to life imprisonment
Replacing the unserved part of the sentence with a lighter one applies to term sentences and does not apply to life imprisonment.
Replacing the unserved part of the sentence with a lighter one applies to term sentences and does not apply to life imprisonment.
Draft law No. 7057 on the strengthening of guarantees of advocacy activity has been registered in the Parliament.
In case of damage to third parties during a road accident by a person who legally owns the insured vehicle, but does not have a license to drive a vehicle of the appropriate category, such a case is insured and, as follows
During the webinar at the Higher School of Advocacy on the topic "Appeals of court decisions in criminal proceedings based on agreements. Cancellation of sentences on the basis of agreements due to non-fulfillment of the agreement”
Yaroslav Zeykan, EQUITY partner, told the Legal High School students about the peculiarities of a lawyer's work with clients during a pre-trial investigation and lawyer ethics.
The Supreme Court published an overview of the actual judicial practice of the chambers and the joint chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice for 2021.
Biological samples may be obtained from a person without his consent only when the purpose of taking such samples is not to obtain evidence against the person providing such samples.
The Supreme Court established that the appellate court committed a significant violation of the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Law and incorrect application of the Law of Ukraine on Criminal Liability.
An application to establish a fact that has legal significance, namely, about the identity of a person, is not subject to consideration in a separate proceeding.
The court pointed out an important aspect in the case of renewal of the deadline for an appeal.
Determining the size of the property damage caused affects the correctness of the qualification of the actions of persons who intentionally destroyed someone else's property — Supreme Court.
For the Bar Council of the Kyiv region, the protection of the rights of lawyers is always a priority.
The panel of judges is convinced that the term of the pre-trial investigation definitely does not stop from the moment of sending or directly handing the notice to the defense about the completion of the pre-trial investigation in order.
The Supreme Court annulled the contested decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated November 18, 2013 and the decision of the Luhansk Oblast Court of Appeal dated October 16, 2013 on the refusal to open appeal proceedings and referred the cas
Taking into account the specific circumstances of this criminal proceeding, the panel of judges of the CCS comes to the conviction that all procedural costs incurred by the pre-trial investigation body and related to the investigation of the crim
Investigative bodies encroach on the independence of lawyers in various forms: from searches and seizures to secret investigative (search) actions.
The decision of the Investigative Court of the Court of Appeals on granting permission to conduct an undercover investigative (search) action cannot be appealed, and therefore it takes legal effect from the moment of its announcement and is subje
Does the procedural decision on the completion of the investigation stop the period of the pre-trial investigation? How to respond to manipulative attempts to interpret the norms of the criminal process?