The Supreme Court considered the cassation appeal of the police against the decisions of the courts, which satisfied the lawsuit of the lawyer, who was searched without proper notification of the bar council of the region.
On December 13, 2022, the Supreme Court left unchanged the verdict of the Dnipro District Court of Kyiv and the Kyiv Court of Appeal in the case of the murder of lawyer Yuriy Ignatenko
<
All evidence collected before entering information into the EDPR is considered inadmissible
In accordance with the provisions of Part 5 of Art. 212-3 of the Criminal Procedure Code, unlawful refusal to provide information, untimely or incomplete provision of information, provision of untrue information in response to a lawyer's
The date of receipt of a document sent by post to the institution is its receipt by the responsible person in the branch or authorized person of the post office
Guilt of PERSON_2 in committing the offense provided for in Part 7 of Art. 212-3 of the Criminal Procedure Code, was fully confirmed in the written evidence collected and examined at the court hearing
A lawyer's personal office is an electronic profile on the official website of NAAU, in which every lawyer can personally edit data about his activities
The relevant decision No. 134 was adopted by the Bar Council of Ukraine on November 16-17, 2022
The Bar Council of the Kyiv Region and the staff of the Bar Council of the Kyiv Region, the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar Association of the Kyiv Region wholeheartedly congratulate dear Olga Borysivna, happy birthday!
Traditionally, we provide a link to the video on YouTube for its independent viewing
Adequacy of evidence is not the same concept as admissibility of means of proof
This decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine will be sent to the Council of Judges of Ukraine, heads of courts and law enforcement agencies.
